Law and psychiatry. Doing forensic work, II: fees, billing, and collections.
نویسنده
چکیده
Forensic practice fees, billing, and collection procedures are quite different from those in general psychiatry. Most forensic practices have far fewer "clients," and individual bills are usually larger. Collections are usually better (and less frequently discounted) in forensic practice, and resolving billing disputes is far more straightforward. Medicare, Medicaid, other insurance coverage, provider networks and agreements, procedure codes, and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) are all largely irrelevant in forensic work (although sometimes important to direct clinical services in correctional psychiatry or forensic treatment clinics). An understanding of the practicalities and ethics of charging and billing for forensic services greatly simplifies practice management.
منابع مشابه
Forensic psychiatrists' fee agreements: a preliminary empirical survey and discussion.
The author performed a preliminary empirical study of forensic fee agreements. A survey of forensic psychiatrists produced samples of fee agreements used for expert witness work. The samples were analyzed to determine patterns of usage, critical elements, styles of agreement design, and other observations. Despite uncertainties of payment in this field, a surprising number of experts do not use...
متن کاملCommentary: "Countertransference" on trial--witness or defendant?
Sattar, et al. have made a contribution to our profession generally in the manner of our use of terminology by noting that some phenomena observed in psychotherapy are similar to those in the work of the forensic psychiatrist, such as in the psychiatric evaluation, preparation of testimony, and provision of testimony. In doing so, the authors clarify the definition of the work of the forensic p...
متن کاملCommentary: compassion at the core of forensic ethics.
In 1982, Dr. Alan Stone raised a central dilemma in ethics for forensic psychiatry that has prompted significant and important discussion of the concerns about twisting justice, prostituting the profession, and operating without adequate ethics guidelines in the course of our work. In presidential addresses to the membership of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL), Dr. Paul App...
متن کاملComparative forensic psychiatry: II. The perizia and the role of the forensic psychiatrist in the Italian legal system.
Understanding the work of forensic psychiatrists in other countries requires a knowledge of the role of the forensic psychiatrist in that country's legal system. It is useful to know the wording of the relevant legal standards and the assumptions and reasoning used by the forensic psychiatrists of that country when applying their expertise to a particular legal issue. The Italian legal system a...
متن کاملRobert I. Simon, MD: Of psychiatry, law, and books.
Dr. Robert I. Simon, this year’s President of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL), is an exceptional psychiatrist, teacher, and colleague. His contributions have earned him the most prestigious awards in the field of forensic psychiatry. In perhaps the ultimate acknowledgment of his erudition, the Supreme Court cited one of his books, Clinical Psychiatry and the Law (1987), in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of psychiatric practice
دوره 18 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012